world of warships henri iv vs hindenburg

Especially with them so catered to by Wargaming. What is the biggest problem for a cruiser? BBs. Mosvka range, which is easy to break 20km, along with railgun velocity, pen values and great accuracy loves to cit Hindies in real games (not this theorycraft junk) over and over. Turtleback is also only really effective at close to med ranges. Sure the hindy has turtleback, but that is just about all the 'better' armor it has over the Moskva. You can usually tell when people make big claims about hindy having better armor is completely connected with not knowing what they are even talking about, or lacking actual experience. I love absolutely melting every hindy I meet. I take Mosvka over Hindy any day of the week. But if you can keep the fighting controlled and in front of you, Moskva is amazing. Being spotted from the Moon with Moskva restricts quite a bit of what I'd like to do. Both are good ships but for me, Hindenburg is more comfortable to play. She will have Radar no matter what, and if the player opts for it, drop Defensive Fire and have both Radar and Hydro.īoth of course can be AA monsters with enough build dedication. What Moskva does have that Hindenburg will never be able to touch are consumables to possibly break a match open.

Her concealment is quite bad as a Cruiser. Clumsy in short ranges, super vulnerable on the sides, but very tough on the front and has very easy to use gunnery. When you surprise a BB near an island with Hindenburg, you can feel the moment when the BB player throws their hands up in the air and gives up. Hindenburg can excel in both long and short ranged fighting. If you drop Defensive Fire, you can have the Best Hydro in the game, Tier X German Hydro.

Spammy guns (extremely forgiving if you have bad aim), lots of torps for close encounters, and protection to buy you time if you actually get into a short ranged fight. IMO, for general pew pew, Hindenburg is better.

World of warships henri iv vs hindenburg